Code-Review on Kevin Quinnhttps://kevinquinn.fun/tags/code-review/Recent content in Code-Review on Kevin QuinnHugo -- gohugo.ioen-usThu, 30 Apr 2026 05:00:00 +0000<link>https://kevinquinn.fun/stream/2026-04-30-tiktok-for-pr-review/</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://kevinquinn.fun/stream/2026-04-30-tiktok-for-pr-review/</guid><description><p><em><strong>TL;DR: what if PR review was as engaging &amp; low-friction as TikTok?</strong></em></p> <p>We&rsquo;ve had a lot of innovation in AI agents producing more code, but I haven&rsquo;t run across much in the way of innovation around how we do code review/PR review. The pace of new code is increasing, but humans reviewing are often still the bottleneck.</p> <p>The knee-jerk reaction I have to get ahead of is <em>&ldquo;jUsT hAVe AI aGEnTs REviEw IT&rdquo;</em> - yes, that can be a tool which helps us, but it&rsquo;s not a solution that covers us 100%. For one, many organizations still require a human-in-the-loop and 1-2 human reviewers for each PR, and we have to work with that constraint until <a href="https://simonwillison.net/2026/Feb/7/software-factory/" title="Software Dark Factory" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener"> Dark Factories</a> become the norm (big maybe there).</p> <p>I&rsquo;m starting to explore some of these ideas in my research repo, feel free to take a look at the interactive demos, or read the <a href="https://research.idontremember.workers.dev/tiktok-pr-reviews/context" title="context page" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener"> context page</a> for the distilled summary of my conversation with Claude about it.</p> <ul> <li>👀<a href="https://research.idontremember.workers.dev/tiktok-pr-reviews/" title="https://research.idontremember.workers.dev/tiktok-pr-reviews/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener"> https://research.idontremember.workers.dev/tiktok-pr-reviews/</a> </li> </ul></description></item></channel></rss>